GOA
STATE INFORMATION COMMISISON
Ground
Floor, Shrama Shakti Bhavan, Patto Plaza, Panaji-Goa
Coram
: Smt. LeenaMehendale, State Chief Information Commissioner
Penalty
No.33/2012 in
Complaint
No.24/SIC/2012
Decided
on . 21/05/2014
Shri
Uday A.C.Priolkar,
R/o.
H.No. C5/55, Mala,
Panaji,
Goa. ……Complainant
V/s
Asst.
Commissioner/ Public Information Officer,
O/o.
the Commerical taxes,
Old
High Court Building,
Panaji,
Goa. ……Opponent
O R D E R ( OPEN COURT )
RTI
application dated : 30/12// 2011
PIO
reply on : 02/02/2012
First
Appeal filed on : Not filed
FAA
Order dated : NIL
Complaint
filed on : 03/02/2012
SCIC
Order in Complaint : 05/07/2012
- This Penalty Cases arises out of Complaint No. 24/SIC/2012 where order was passed on 05/07/2012 holding that
“The
Complaint is allowed. No intervention of this Commission is
required as information is furnished”.
“Issue
notice Section 20(1) of the Right to Information Act, 2005 to the
Opponent/PIO to show cause why penal action not be taken against him
for causing delay in furnishing the information”.
- Accordingly Notice was issued fixing the first hearing on 21/8/2012. However, case could not be heard as the post SCIC remained vacant and hearing was resumed only in November 2013.
PIO
has filed he say on 21/5/2014. He states that the RTI Appeal was
received on 30/12/2011. Reply was given on 02/02/2012. Thus there is
a minor delay of 3-4 days. He submitted that both PIO himself and
APIO were holding double charges. Further, they alongwith majority of
staff was given Election Duty thus there was no deliberate or
Malafide intension. He prays for condoling the small delay.
…2/-
-
- 2 - -
The
Complaint has remained the continuously absent on last two
occasions, hence it can be presumed that since he has received the
information, he has no more interest in the matter.
(Leena
Mehendale)
Goa State Chief Information Commissioner,
Panaji-Goa
No comments:
Post a Comment